Somebody who I don’t know writes:
If you happen to resolve to share this publicly, say in your weblog, let me keep nameless.
It’s humorous how folks need anonymity on these items!
Anyway, my correspondent continues:
I got here throughout this 2016 PNAS article, “Seasonality in human cognitive mind responses.”
It has this attention-grabbing determine:
The identical information are plotted twice, as soon as within the left half of the determine, and once more in the suitable half. The horizontal axis is repeated, so we aren’t taking a look at information fabrication. Within the caption, the authors say “n=28”. (Two pairs of dots overlap, so that you see solely 26 dots in every half). Additionally they describe this determine as a “double plot”. I did an web seek for “double plot” and, as far as I can inform, there is no such thing as a such factor. The closest factor was a dual-axis plot, which isn’t what the authors have right here. They’ve used “double plots” in different figures within the paper too.
Going by how the authors drew the x-axis and their disclosure that “n=28”, I assume that the authors didn’t imply to deceive the readers. However I nonetheless discover it misleading. I can hardly consider a scenario the place repeating a plot is a good suggestion. But when an creator should do it, they need to most likely not simply name it a “double plot” and go away it at that. They need to describe what it’s they’ve executed and why.
Yeah, that is wack! The pure factor can be to only present one 12 months and never duplicate any information—I assume then there’s a priority that you simply wouldn’t see the continuity between December and January. However, yeah, repeating the complete factor looks as if a bit a lot.
Right here’s what I’d advocate: Show one 12 months, Winter/Spring/Summer season/Fall, then append Fall on the left and Winter on the suitable (so now you’re displaying 18 months) however grey out the duplicate months, so then it’s clear that they’re not further information, they’re simply exhibiting the continuity of the sample.
Better of each worlds!
P.S. The duplicate graph jogs my memory of a hilarious lampshade I noticed as soon as that seemed like a map of the world, but it surely truly was two maps: that’s, it went world wide twice, in order that from any horizontal angle you would see all 360 levels. I attempted to search out a picture on-line however no quantity of googling took me to it.
Somebody who I don’t know writes:
If you happen to resolve to share this publicly, say in your weblog, let me keep nameless.
It’s humorous how folks need anonymity on these items!
Anyway, my correspondent continues:
I got here throughout this 2016 PNAS article, “Seasonality in human cognitive mind responses.”
It has this attention-grabbing determine:
The identical information are plotted twice, as soon as within the left half of the determine, and once more in the suitable half. The horizontal axis is repeated, so we aren’t taking a look at information fabrication. Within the caption, the authors say “n=28”. (Two pairs of dots overlap, so that you see solely 26 dots in every half). Additionally they describe this determine as a “double plot”. I did an web seek for “double plot” and, as far as I can inform, there is no such thing as a such factor. The closest factor was a dual-axis plot, which isn’t what the authors have right here. They’ve used “double plots” in different figures within the paper too.
Going by how the authors drew the x-axis and their disclosure that “n=28”, I assume that the authors didn’t imply to deceive the readers. However I nonetheless discover it misleading. I can hardly consider a scenario the place repeating a plot is a good suggestion. But when an creator should do it, they need to most likely not simply name it a “double plot” and go away it at that. They need to describe what it’s they’ve executed and why.
Yeah, that is wack! The pure factor can be to only present one 12 months and never duplicate any information—I assume then there’s a priority that you simply wouldn’t see the continuity between December and January. However, yeah, repeating the complete factor looks as if a bit a lot.
Right here’s what I’d advocate: Show one 12 months, Winter/Spring/Summer season/Fall, then append Fall on the left and Winter on the suitable (so now you’re displaying 18 months) however grey out the duplicate months, so then it’s clear that they’re not further information, they’re simply exhibiting the continuity of the sample.
Better of each worlds!
P.S. The duplicate graph jogs my memory of a hilarious lampshade I noticed as soon as that seemed like a map of the world, but it surely truly was two maps: that’s, it went world wide twice, in order that from any horizontal angle you would see all 360 levels. I attempted to search out a picture on-line however no quantity of googling took me to it.