Jonathan Heppner noticed our put up, Refuted papers continue to be cited more than their failed replications: Can a new search engine be built that will fix this problem?, writes:
I [Heppner] am a thinker of psychology working with the ResearchHub Foundation. Our mission is to decentralize scientific publishing, and an important side of our method is aligning educational incentives with the precise high quality of analysis.
At the moment, I’m spearheading a marketing campaign to determine certified scientific fraud investigators who can present content material on our platform.
At ResearchHub, we’re a passionate group of scientists decided to revolutionize the standard publishing mannequin in academia. We provide monetary incentives for numerous contributions, together with posting analysis, writing peer critiques, and submitting literature critiques, all geared in direction of accelerating scientific analysis whereas bettering the standard of rigor.
Transparency is a key for us, and we straight connect peer critiques to revealed articles. This method permits readers to simply assess how a paper is obtained by friends, offering a clearer image of its validity.
I took a glance, and this appears to related to one thing referred to as Analysis Coin? I informed Heppner that I’m involved about these Coin issues as I’ve heard they’re very wasteful of vitality.
He replied:
I perceive that you’re cautious of the cash, since that could be a fairly frequent perspective held by individuals typically. Nonetheless, the blockchain group has heard the vitality criticism and the chain on which our coin exists, Ethereum, has switched to a extra energy-efficient methodology (Proof of Stake). It now makes use of only ~0.0026 TWh/yr.
I adopted the hyperlink, and, if that is for actual, then, yeah, Bitcoin actually does appear fairly horrible. However I do know nothing about any of this (aside from scientific fraud; that’s a subject that I want I knew much less about!); I’m simply sharing it right here in case it pursuits a few of you.