Many are acquainted with F.A. Hayek’s Road to Serfdom. Fewer know of Wilhelm Röpke’s The Solution to the German Problem. The 2 books are in primary settlement in regards to the political and financial elements resulting in the rise of the Third Reich, however Röpke’s higher emphasis on financial tradition yielded timeless insights in regards to the human capability for blindness when confronted with truths which are, or which appear to be, too horrible to take a look at.
![](https://www.econlib.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/51DoPAUNPvL._SY522_.jpg)
The arguments of The Street to Serfdom and The Answer to the German Drawback overlap in basic respects. Shortly after the Potsdam Settlement, each shot a warning flare to those that have been keen to see it: Hayek threatened that “It’s vital now to state the unpalatable reality that it’s Germany whose destiny we are actually in some hazard of repeating,” and Röpke cautioned a 12 months later in his personal quantity, “let not the Englishman or America be too certain that ‘it may’t occur right here’.” Why? Each thought that fascism and socialism are to not be understood as distant and incompatible enemies however as cousins with shared necessities, most significantly collectivism.
What distinguished Röpke’s argument was the declare that it was a type of cultural illness that defined the rise of Nazi Germany, and it was a illness that Germany shared with the western powers. The Answer to the German Drawback is a wide-ranging quantity that covers a variety of floor, going again even to the forests of medieval Germany in the hunt for the cultural sources of the Third Reich; these pathways of the ebook are fascinating, however it isn’t my purpose to offer a abstract. As a substitute, I focus right here solely on the principle argument, which was that the blindness of Germans and of the remainder of the world to the Nazi menace was because of a “weakening of the ethical reflexes.”
The end result was that individuals “have been blind as a result of they have been decided to be blind,” even within the face of “unprecedented barbarism.” On this fashionable tragedy folks “merely didn’t need to know, as a result of it was inconvenient information.” On this situation, there was “common passivity” and “paralysis” ensuing from “a non secular and ethical poisoning” that made folks decided to “ignore the writing on the wall so as to postpone the day of reckoning and to buy a number of years of peace and luxury, on the worth of a most horrible last disaster.”
One actually should go to Röpke’s A Humane Economy to see the kinds of virtues rising from a wealthy cultural soil that he thought have been vital for individuals who would have been extra able to rising to the event of pre-war Germany. In his prognosis of a “non secular and ethical poisoning,” Röpke had in thoughts this broad cultural basis of advantage, however one can level to varied concrete cases of their absence within the history of the rise of the Third Reich that appear to bear this out: the stab-in-the-back fantasy that allowed many Germans to put blame for the lack of the Nice Struggle and the signing of the Armistice on civilians and, specifically, Jewish folks, reasonably than on the Military; the unwillingness of the assorted events within the Reichstag to coalesce round a unified opposition to the Nationwide Socialists even after the Beer Corridor Putsch; the unwillingness of the allied nations to take motion even after open German rearmament started – in apparent violation of the phrases of Versailles; the collective plugging of the ears throughout Churchill’s many warnings within the years previous the invasion of Poland. One might add to this record a sure pressure of American isolationist impulse, effectively described in a recent book; this, I hasten so as to add, is an impulse typically wedded to a bizarre antisemitism.
![](https://www.econlib.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/download.jpg)
What one can’t add to that record is Wilhelm Röpke. A professor in Germany on the time of the start of the Third Reich, he thought his platform gave him an obligation to “converse a phrase of warning,” so he wrote and distributed a leaflet, by which he appealed to his fellow Germans’ “widespread sense and their consciences,” exhibiting “how appallingly they have been being deceived.” Though his warnings fell effectively quick of the particular atrocities that might come by Nazi fingers, he was “laughed at and abused.” Later, he delivered a speech, by the way on the very morning earlier than the burning of the Reichstag in February 1933; in it, Röpke warned that the Nazis have been “continuing to show the backyard of civilization into fallow land and to permit it to revert to the primeval jungle.” The speech caught the eye of the Nazis, and he quickly fled in exile, till, via the blunt trauma of conflict, extra folks would see clearly that he had been proper all alongside.
Invoice Reddinger has been a professor of political science at Regent College since 2010. Previous to that, he taught political science at Wheaton Faculty in Illinois and at South Texas Faculty. He obtained his undergraduate diploma from Grove Metropolis Faculty in Pennsylvania earlier than finishing his M.A. and Ph.D. in Political Science at Northern Illinois College, the place his research targeted on the historical past of political philosophy and American political thought. You may also discover Reddinger’s posts in the OLL Reading Room.